Well Told Grants

Federal grant programs / Department of Agriculture

Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Agreement Authority (10.693)

Also known as Wyden Amendment

Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Agreement Authority (Assistance Listing 10.693) is run by the Forest Service, part of the Department of Agriculture. It awarded $9.6 million in 30 grants from fiscal 2021 to 2025, about $318,887 per award on average. No funding opportunity is open on Grants.gov right now.

The typical award was $288,000. Half of the 30 awards fell between $166,134 and $447,618, and they ranged from $15,000 to $1.1 million.

Key findings

What the program funds

To enter into agreements with willing participants for the protection, restoration, and enhancement of aquatic and wildlife habitat and other resources on public or private land and for the reduction of risk from natural disaster where public safety is threatened that benefit these resources within the watershed.

From the federal Assistance Listing. Read the full listing on SAM.gov.

Open opportunities

No opportunity under this program is open or forecast on Grants.gov right now. Programs often post once a year, so the funding history below shows what to expect.

Rules from the program listing

Who can apply

Private landowners, State, local or Tribal governments or other public entities, educational institutions or private nonprofit entities.

What the money can and cannot pay for

Projects that protect, enhance, or restore resources within a watershed and provide tangible benefits to achieving Forest Service goals and objectives are allowable under Wyden. Project types are not limited to actual projects on the ground; for example, stream gabion installation, check dam construction, fish habitat restoration, or culvert cleaning. Watershed analysis studies, habitat surveys and wildlife species monitoring, depending on the benefit to resources within the watershed, are also permissible under Wyden. Any project carried out under Wyden authority must comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations, policies and permit requirements; for example, National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Water Act, and Endangered Species Act. Projects must be within a watershed for the stated program objectives. ;

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. Matching requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing. MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Award range and average, in the agency's words

Varies by type of project and funding available.

Examples of funded projects

Fiscal Year2025: The Intermountain Bird Observatory (IBO) created an American goshawk viability model on the Malheur, Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests. The IBO delivered document data to include all Geographical information System (GIS) layer files highlighting goshawk monitoring suggestions, using the models, for the Forest Service.

Quoted from the program's federal Assistance Listing. The notice of funding opportunity is the official source for each competition's rules.

Funding history and past recipients

From fiscal 2021 to 2025, Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Agreement Authority (10.693) awarded $9.6 million across 30 grant awards, an average of $318,887 per award.

Largest recipients, fiscal 2021 to 2025
RecipientStateAwardsAmount
Fire Safe Council of Siskiyou CountyCalifornia3$1.3 million
El Dorado County Fire Safe CouncilCalifornia2$1.2 million
Butte County Fire Safe CouncilCalifornia4$1.2 million
Sierra County Fire Safe and Watershed Council, Inc.California1$1.1 million
Yuba Watershed Protection and Fire Safe CouncilCalifornia2$856,407
Iowa Hill Community ClubCalifornia2$750,000
Ore-Cal Resource Conservation and Development Area CouncilCalifornia1$720,000
Plumas County Firesafe CouncilCalifornia3$674,684
Resource Conservation District of Greater San Diego CountyCalifornia2$576,000
County of NevadaCalifornia1$522,080
Plumas CorporationCalifornia1$440,470
Calaveras County Water DistrictCalifornia1$393,100
The Watershed Research and Training CenterCalifornia1$230,000
County of KernCalifornia1$172,360
Ventura County Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia1$108,350
Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians of the Tuolumne Rancheria of CaliforniaCalifornia1$94,342
Athens Soil & Water Conservation DistrictOhio1$64,165
Cascade Pacific RC&DOregon1$50,501
Friends of the Mad RiverVermont1$15,000

Top states: California ($9.6 million), Ohio ($64,165), Oregon ($50,501), Vermont ($15,000).

Who usually wins

Nonprofits received 76% of the money, state and local governments 23% and tribes 1.0%.

Recipient typeAwardsAmountShare
Nonprofits21$7.3 million76%
State and local governments8$2.2 million23%
Tribal governments and organizations1$94,3391.0%

By state

1 state has a page for this program: those that received at least $1 million or 10 awards. It is California.

Grants by recipient's state, fiscal 2021 to 2025
StateAwardsAmount
California27$9.6 million
Ohio1$64,165
Oregon1$50,501
Vermont1$15,000

Award amounts are federal obligations reported to USAspending.gov for fiscal 2021 to 2025; see how our data works.