Cooperative Agreements for Diabetes Control Programs (93.988)
Cooperative Agreements for Diabetes Control Programs (Assistance Listing 93.988) is run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, part of the Department of Health and Human Services. It awarded $160 million in 203 grants from fiscal 2021 to 2025, about $787,671 per award on average. No funding opportunity is open on Grants.gov right now.
The typical award was $375,000. Half of the 203 awards fell between $170,423 and $1.0 million, and they ranged from $8,051 to $30.0 million.
- Awarded, FY 2021 to 2025$160 million
- Grant awards203
- Typical award$375,000
- Awarded in FY 2025$49.7 million
- Size rank669 of 1,823
- Type of assistanceCooperative agreements
Key findings
- It is the 669th largest of 1,823 federal grant programs by five-year awards.
- The 20 largest recipients received 51% of the money.
- Awards went to recipients in 58 states and territories.
What the program funds
Diabetes Prevention and Control Programs (DPCPs) are funded by the CDC's Division of Diabetes Translation to address the following national level goals: 1) Prevent diabetes. 2) Prevent the complications, disabilities, and burden associated with diabetes. 3) Eliminate diabetes-related health inconsistencies. 4) Maximize organizational capacity to achieve the National Diabetes Program goals. DPCPs aim to achieve system and population-level change and, ultimately, to improve health outcomes by coordinating and leveraging the efforts of the statewide diabetes community. They are responsible for establishing partnerships with key organizations in support of the national goals stated above, and for implementing and evaluating evidence-based interventions in three main areas: 1. Intervention #1: Improve quality of clinical care for populations with greatest diabetes burden and risk to improve control of A1c, blood pressure, and cholesterol, and to promote tobacco cessation. 2. Intervention #2: Increase access to sustainable self-management education and support services for populations with greatest diabetes burden and risk to improve control of A1c, blood pressure, and cholesterol, and to promote tobacco cessation. 3. Intervention #3: Increase use of lifestyle change programs that have achieved CDC recognition (or pending recognition) to prevent or delay onset of type 2 diabetes among people at high risk. Assist State and local health authorities and other health related organizations in controlling communicable diseases, chronic diseases and disorders and other preventable health conditions. Provide specific health surveillance using telephone and multi-mode survey methodologies for the behaviors of the general population that contribute to the occurrences and prevention of chronic diseases, injuries and other public health threats. The collection, analysis and dissemination of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data to state and territorial health department categorical programs is used for assessing trends, directing program planning, evaluating program priorities, developing policies and targeting relevant population groups.
Open opportunities
No opportunity under this program is open or forecast on Grants.gov right now. Programs often post once a year, so the funding history below shows what to expect.
Rules from the program listing
Who can apply
Eligible applicants are the official State and territorial health agencies of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Republic of Palau, and American Samoa.
What the money can and cannot pay for
Cooperative Agreement funds may be used for costs associated with planning, implementing, and evaluating State based diabetes control programs. Cooperative Agreement funds may not be used for direct curative or rehabilitative services. Cooperative Agreement funds may also be used for health surveillance around BRFSS activities.
Matching requirements
This program has no statutory formula. Matching funds are required from non-federal sources in the amount of not less than $1 for each $4 federal funds awarded to grantees. No matching funds are required for the Health Surveillance BRFSS program.MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.
Deadlines
Check Grants.gov for any relevant NOFO information regarding processes for applying for assistance.
Award range and average, in the agency's words
Component A: award range of $850,000-$1,250,000 Component B: award range of $750,000-$1,100,000 Component C: award range of $2,500,000-$3,300,000
Funding history and past recipients
From fiscal 2021 to 2025, Cooperative Agreements for Diabetes Control Programs (93.988) awarded $160 million across 203 grant awards, an average of $787,671 per award.
Who usually wins
State and local governments received 53% of the money, colleges and universities 30% and nonprofits 13%.
| Recipient type | Awards | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| State and local governments | 139 | $84.4 million | 53% |
| Colleges and universities | 32 | $47.5 million | 30% |
| Nonprofits | 24 | $20.7 million | 13% |
| Small businesses | 3 | $6.0 million | 3.8% |
| Businesses | 2 | $1.2 million | 0.8% |
| Other | 3 | $211,915 | 0.1% |
By state
40 states have a page for this program: those that received at least $1 million or 10 awards.
| State | Awards | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Georgia | 6 | $37.2 million |
| Illinois | 11 | $11.5 million |
| Michigan | 8 | $7.2 million |
| Virginia | 5 | $6.9 million |
| California | 12 | $5.3 million |
| Texas | 4 | $4.7 million |
| Pennsylvania | 8 | $3.6 million |
| Florida | 3 | $3.5 million |
| New York | 5 | $3.5 million |
| District of Columbia | 6 | $3.4 million |
| Louisiana | 3 | $3.4 million |
| New Mexico | 4 | $3.3 million |
| Minnesota | 3 | $3.2 million |
| South Carolina | 6 | $3.0 million |
| Maryland | 4 | $3.0 million |
| Kansas | 2 | $2.8 million |
| Washington | 5 | $2.7 million |
| New Jersey | 3 | $2.7 million |
| Colorado | 5 | $2.7 million |
| Iowa | 2 | $2.7 million |
| Indiana | 3 | $2.6 million |
| Arkansas | 3 | $2.4 million |
| Mississippi | 3 | $2.2 million |
| Massachusetts | 4 | $2.0 million |
| Delaware | 2 | $1.9 million |
| Utah | 3 | $1.9 million |
| Idaho | 2 | $1.9 million |
| Hawaii | 2 | $1.9 million |
| Arizona | 2 | $1.8 million |
| Kentucky | 2 | $1.8 million |
| North Dakota | 2 | $1.8 million |
| North Carolina | 4 | $1.6 million |
| Connecticut | 3 | $1.5 million |
| Oregon | 3 | $1.4 million |
| Ohio | 3 | $1.3 million |
| Rhode Island | 2 | $1.1 million |
| Maine | 2 | $1.1 million |
| West Virginia | 2 | $1.1 million |
| Alaska | 2 | $1.0 million |
| South Dakota | 2 | $1.0 million |
| Montana | 2 | $990,000 |
| Vermont | 2 | $984,000 |
| Wisconsin | 3 | $917,949 |
| New Hampshire | 2 | $910,455 |
| Tennessee | 3 | $828,885 |
| Nevada | 2 | $810,531 |
| Puerto Rico | 3 | $783,864 |
| Missouri | 2 | $782,336 |
| Alabama | 2 | $723,383 |
| Oklahoma | 2 | $711,529 |
| Guam | 3 | $632,722 |
| Federated States of Micronesia | 3 | $436,558 |
| U.S. Virgin Islands | 3 | $361,130 |
| American Samoa | 3 | $316,970 |
| Wyoming | 2 | $314,133 |
| Palau | 3 | $288,850 |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 3 | $232,700 |
| Marshall Islands | 2 | $173,200 |