Well Told Grants

Federal grant programs / Department of Health and Human Services

Special Projects of National Significance (93.928)

Also known as SPNS

Special Projects of National Significance (Assistance Listing 93.928) is run by the Health Resources and Services Administration, part of the Department of Health and Human Services. It awarded $104 million in 85 grants from fiscal 2021 to 2025, about $1.2 million per award on average. No funding opportunity is open on Grants.gov right now.

The typical award was $308,824. Half of the 85 awards fell between $43,082 and $974,800, and they ranged from $2,000 to $19.3 million.

Key findings

What the program funds

The purpose of the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP) Part F Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) Program is to support the development of innovative models of HIV care and treatment to quickly respond to emerging needs of RWHAP clients. Through its demonstration, implementation, and health information technology projects, SPNS uses implementation science to evaluate the design, implementation, use, cost, and health-related outcomes of treatment strategies while promoting the dissemination and replication of successful interventions in the RWHAP. This unique program advances knowledge and skills in the delivery of health care, support services, and data integration to serve RWHAP priority populations. Through these special projects, RWHAP SPNS recipients implement a variety of interventions that advance public health knowledge and help to achieve the goal of ending the HIV epidemic in the United States.

From the federal Assistance Listing. Read the full listing on SAM.gov.

Open opportunities

No opportunity under this program is open or forecast on Grants.gov right now. Programs often post once a year, so the funding history below shows what to expect.

Rules from the program listing

Who can apply

Academic institutions, non-profit organizations including faith-based organizations, and those eligible for funding under Parts A-D authorized by Title XXVI of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act. Additionally, federally recognized Indian Tribal Governments and tribal organizations are also eligible to apply for these funds.

What the money can and cannot pay for

Proposals are expected to adequately define and justify the needs, innovative nature, and evaluation methodology of the proposed model of services. Funds shall be used to create and/or evaluate innovative models of HIV care, services, capacity development initiatives, and health information and technology data systems that would likely not exist nor be evaluated without RWHAP Part F SPNS Program support, or that would extend the care model to previously underserved or uninsured populations.

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. Matching requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing. MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Deadlines

Contact the headquarters or regional location, as appropriate for application deadlines

Award range and average, in the agency's words

Coop. Agreements: FY23 (actual): $723,253 to $4,825,00 Average: $1,836,111.44 FY24 (est.): to $4,825,000 FY25 (est.): $729,580 to $4,783,537 Project Grants: FY23 (actual): $218,591 to $300,000 FY24 (est.): $218,093.00 to $300,000 FY 25 (est.): $300,000 to $365,000

Examples of funded projects

Fiscal Year2016: Fiscal Year 2016: Cooperative Agreements: Dissemination of Evidence-Informed Interventions to Improve Health Outcomes along the HIV Care Continuum Initiative - This initiative adapted four linkage and retention interventions from prior SPNS and the Secretary's Minority AIDS Initiative Fund (SMAIF) initiatives to improve health outcomes along the HIV care continuum. The initiative is funding two cooperative agreements, a Dissemination and Evaluation Center (DEC) for five years, and an Implementation Technical Assistance Center (ITAC) for four years. The end goal of the initiative is to produce four evidence-informed Care And Treatment Interventions (CATIs) that are replicable, cost-effective, capable of producing optimal HIV care continuum outcomes, and easily adaptable to the changing health care environment. The multi-site evaluation of this initiative will take a rigorous Implementation Science (IS) approach, which places greater emphasis on evaluation of the implementation process and cost analyses of the interventions, while seeking to improve the HIV care continuum outcomes of linkage, retention, re-engagement and viral suppression among client participants.

Continue reading on SAM.gov

Quoted from the program's federal Assistance Listing. The notice of funding opportunity is the official source for each competition's rules.

Funding history and past recipients

From fiscal 2021 to 2025, Special Projects of National Significance (93.928) awarded$104 million across 85 grant awards, an average of $1.2 million per award.

Largest recipients, fiscal 2021 to 2025
RecipientStateAwardsAmount
Fenway Community Health Center, Inc.Massachusetts2$20.1 million
National Alliance of State & Territorial AIDS DirectorsDistrict of Columbia1$13.9 million
Jsi Research & Training Institute IncMassachusetts6$13.3 million
Corporation for Supportive HousingNew York1$13.2 million
The Regents of the University of California, San FranciscoCalifornia4$6.2 million
The Johns Hopkins UniversityMaryland1$4.2 million
Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts1$3.2 million
Yale UnivConnecticut3$3.1 million
National Opinion Research CenterIllinois2$3.0 million
Health Research, Inc.New York1$2.4 million
The University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort WorthTexas1$2.3 million
Cicatelli Associates, Inc.New York3$2.2 million
Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia1$1.1 million
Boston Medical Center CorporationMassachusetts1$974,982
Beth Israel Medical CenterNew York1$974,800
Centro Ararat, Inc.Puerto Rico1$973,301
The University of ChicagoIllinois1$971,507
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNorth Carolina1$935,141
Empower "U", Inc.Florida2$904,000
Family Health Centers of San Diego IncCalifornia1$900,000

Top states: Massachusetts ($38.4 million), New York ($20.1 million), District of Columbia ($15.0 million), California ($8.4 million), Maryland ($4.7 million), Illinois ($3.8 million), Connecticut ($3.4 million), Texas ($3.2 million), Pennsylvania ($1.2 million), North Carolina ($982,898).

Who usually wins

State and local governments received less than 0.1% of the money.

Recipient typeAwardsAmountShare
Other83$104 million100%
State and local governments2$6,000less than 0.1%

By state

9 states have a page for this program: those that received at least $1 million or 10 awards.

Grants by recipient's state, fiscal 2021 to 2025
StateAwardsAmount
Massachusetts12$38.4 million
New York12$20.1 million
District of Columbia2$15.0 million
California14$8.4 million
Maryland2$4.7 million
Illinois5$3.8 million
Connecticut4$3.4 million
Texas8$3.2 million
Pennsylvania5$1.2 million
North Carolina2$982,898
Puerto Rico1$973,301
Florida3$908,000
Colorado1$784,485
Georgia4$557,887
Nebraska1$308,827
Indiana1$308,824
New Jersey1$278,533
New Mexico1$243,942
Minnesota1$175,000
Nevada1$175,000
Louisiana2$125,689
Oregon1$4,000

Award amounts are federal obligations reported to USAspending.gov for fiscal 2021 to 2025; see how our data works.