Well Told Grants

Federal grant programs / Environmental Protection Agency

Brownfields Training, Research, and Technical Assistance Grants and Cooperative Agreements (66.814)

Also known as Brownfields 104(k)(7) Grants

Brownfields Training, Research, and Technical Assistance Grants and Cooperative Agreements (Assistance Listing 66.814) is run by the Environmental Protection Agency. It awarded $78.9 million in 21 grants from fiscal 2021 to 2025, about $3.8 million per award on average. No funding opportunity is open on Grants.gov right now.

The typical award was $1.4 million. Half of the 21 awards fell between $1.0 million and $5.0 million, and they ranged from $400,000 to $23.0 million.

Key findings

What the program funds

Brownfield sites are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. CERCLA Section 104(k)(7) provides EPA with authority for a financial assistance program of training, research, and technical assistance to individuals and organizations to facilitate the inventory of brownfield properties, assessments, cleanup of brownfield properties, community involvement, or site preparation. Funding Priorities - Fiscal Year 2026, EPA fully fund the Technical Assistance to Brownfields (TAB) cooperative agreements with satisfactory project progress selected in previous CERCLA Section 104(k)(7) training, research, and technical assistance grant competitions. Additionally, using a competitive grants process, EPA may select applications and award cooperative agreements for technical assistance to support specific sector needs (e.g., revolving loan fund, Tribal governments) to help communities increase their understanding of brownfields issues and advance their brownfields assessment, cleanup and reuse goals.

From the federal Assistance Listing. Read the full listing on SAM.gov.

Open opportunities

No opportunity under this program is open or forecast on Grants.gov right now. Programs often post once a year, so the funding history below shows what to expect.

Rules from the program listing

Who can apply

For certain competitive funding opportunities under this assistance listing, the Agency may limit eligibility to compete to a number or subset of eligible applicants consistent with the Agency's Assistance Agreement Competition Policy. Under CERCLA Section 104(k)(7), EPA may provide financial assistance to eligible entities and other nonprofit organizations. CERCLA 104(k)(1) defines eligible entities as: a general purpose unit of local government; a land clearance authority or other quasi-governmental entity that operates under the supervision and control of, or as an agent of, a general purpose unit of local government; a government entity created by a State legislature; a regional council or group of general purpose units of local government; a redevelopment agency that is chartered or otherwise sanctioned by a State; a State (note CERCLA 107(27) defines term "State" to include territories or possessions over which the United States has jurisdiction); a Federally recognized Indian Tribe other than in Alaska; an Alaska Native Regional Corporation, Alaska Native Village Corporation and the Metlakatla Indian Community; Intertribal consortia, except consortia comprised of ineligible Alaskan tribes; nonprofit organizations exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, Limited liability corporation in which all managing members are 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations or limited liability corporations whose sole members are 501(c)(3) nonprofit...

Continue reading on SAM.gov

What the money can and cannot pay for

Funds awarded under Section 104(k)(7) of CERCLA must be used for training, research, and technical assistance to individuals and organizations, to facilitate the inventory of brownfields properties, site assessments, cleanup of brownfields properties, community involvement, or site preparation. Cooperative agreements are available to support recipients' eligible and allowable direct costs incurred under an approved workplan plus allowable programmatic costs, in accordance with established EPA policies and regulations. Costs incurred under CERCLA Section 104(k)(7) cooperative agreements may not be used for a penalty or fine, a Federal cost-share requirement, a response cost for which the recipient of the cooperative agreement is potentially liable under CERCLA Section 107, or the cost of complying with a Federal law, with the exception of the costs of laws applicable to cleanup of brownfield sites. Administrative costs, including indirect costs, are limited to 5% of the amount of EPA funding as required by CERCLA Section 104(k)(5)(E). Grant funds cannot be used for the payment of administrative costs, including all indirect costs and direct costs for grant administration, in excess of five (5) percent of the total amount of EPA grant funding, with the exception of financial and performance reporting costs which are considered allowable programmatic costs and not subject to the 5% limitation.;

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. Matching requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing. MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Deadlines

For competitive awards, deadlines will be specified in the competitive announcement.

Award range and average, in the agency's words

Historically, the Brownfields Training, Research, and Technical Assistance cooperative agreements have ranged anywhere from $200,000 to $2,000,000 over the entire cooperative agreement, depending on the specific focus area of solicitation and the project period of the award (typical project period is 5 years). The number of awards depends on available funding and expressed community need. Typically no more than five awards are made in a given year. New awards made for other research, training and technical assistance agreements when funding through IIJA is available typically range between $200,000 and $5,000,000 and may be incrementally funded over the project period if the award is above $200,000.

Examples of funded projects

Fiscal Year2016: EPA expects to award cooperative agreements for regional Technical Assistance to Brownfields (TAB) providers. TAB providers will be available to brownfields communities to assist them with understanding how to address brownfield sites and advance local efforts around brownfields assessment, cleanup and reuse. EPA expects to provide incremental funding to previously awarded cooperative agreement recipients if they make satisfactory progress. These EPA funds will be used for research, training and technical assistance projects related to technical assistance to environmental workforce development and job training (EWDJT) grantees; technical assistance on the integration of environmental justice and equitable development for brownfields-impacted communities; research on the benefits of brownfields redevelopment; technical assistance on brownfields financing and economic development strategies to brownfields-impacted communities; organize a national brownfields conference in 2017; state support on brownfields issues and tribal support on brownfields issues. EPA expects to award cooperative agreements for regional Technical Assistance to Brownfields (TAB) providers. TAB providers will be available to brownfields communities to assist them with understanding how to address brownfield sites and advance local efforts around brownfields assessment, cleanup and reuse.

Continue reading on SAM.gov

Quoted from the program's federal Assistance Listing. The notice of funding opportunity is the official source for each competition's rules.

Funding history and past recipients

From fiscal 2021 to 2025, Brownfields Training, Research, and Technical Assistance Grants and Cooperative Agreements (66.814) awarded $78.9 million across 21 grant awards, an average of $3.8 million per award.

Largest recipients, fiscal 2021 to 2025
RecipientStateAwardsAmount
Kansas State UniversityKansas3$32.1 million
Center for Creative Land RecyclingCalifornia2$12.0 million
New Jersey Institute of TechnologyNew Jersey2$11.0 million
West Virginia University Research CorporationWest Virginia2$6.0 million
University of Connecticut Health CenterConnecticut2$6.0 million
International City/County Management Association (the)District of Columbia3$4.3 million
National Council for Community Development, IncNew York1$3.0 million
Groundwork USA IncNew York2$1.6 million
Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials, IncDistrict of Columbia1$1.4 million
University of Massachusetts DartmouthMassachusetts1$500,000
Center for Land Reform, IncMichigan1$499,209
Eastern Iowa Community College DistrictIowa1$400,000

Top states: Kansas ($32.1 million), California ($12.0 million), New Jersey ($11.0 million), Connecticut ($6.0 million), West Virginia ($6.0 million), District of Columbia ($5.7 million), New York ($4.6 million), Massachusetts ($500,000), Michigan ($499,209), Iowa ($400,000).

Who usually wins

Colleges and universities received 63% of the money, nonprofits 37%.

Recipient typeAwardsAmountShare
Colleges and universities9$50.0 million63%
Nonprofits12$28.8 million37%

By state

7 states have a page for this program: those that received at least $1 million or 10 awards.

Grants by recipient's state, fiscal 2021 to 2025
StateAwardsAmount
Kansas3$32.1 million
California2$12.0 million
New Jersey2$11.0 million
Connecticut2$6.0 million
West Virginia2$6.0 million
District of Columbia4$5.7 million
New York3$4.6 million
Massachusetts1$500,000
Michigan1$499,209
Iowa1$400,000

Award amounts are federal obligations reported to USAspending.gov for fiscal 2021 to 2025; see how our data works.