Well Told Grants

Federal grant programs / Environmental Protection Agency

Superfund State, Political Subdivision, and Indian Tribe Site-Specific Cooperative Agreements (66.802)

Superfund State, Political Subdivision, and Indian Tribe Site-Specific Cooperative Agreements (Assistance Listing 66.802) is run by the Environmental Protection Agency. It awarded $502 million in 558 grants from fiscal 2021 to 2025, about $899,832 per award on average. No funding opportunity is open on Grants.gov right now.

The typical award was $200,000. Half of the 558 awards fell between $67,576 and $601,196, and they ranged from $2,354 to $24.1 million.

Key findings

What the program funds

The goals of this assistance listing are to (1) conduct site characterization activities at potential or confirmed hazardous waste sites; (2) undertake response planning and implementation actions at sites on the National Priorities List (NPL) to clean up the hazardous waste sites that are found to pose hazards to human health; and (3) effectively implement the statutory requirements of CERCLA 121(f) which mandates substantial and meaningful State involvement. Funding Priorities - Fiscal Year 2026: Funding must be used at specific hazardous waste sites to: (1) conduct non-time critical removal actions; (2) perform site characterization activities such as preliminary assessments, site inspections, remedial investigations, feasibility studies, and remedial design activities at potential or confirmed hazardous waste sites; (3) conduct remedial actions (i.e., cleanup) at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites as listed on the National Priorities List (NPL); (4) support CERCLA implementation activities; (5) identify Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs); (6) conduct settlement negotiations; (7) take enforcement actions against PRPs; and (8) oversee PRP cleanups.

From the federal Assistance Listing. Read the full listing on SAM.gov.

Open opportunities

No opportunity under this program is open or forecast on Grants.gov right now. Programs often post once a year, so the funding history below shows what to expect.

Rules from the program listing

Who can apply

States (and political subdivisions thereof), Commonwealths, U.S. Territories and Possessions, and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments, including intertribal consortia and political subdivisions.

What the money can and cannot pay for

Site-specific work within EPA's Superfund Remedial Program. More specifically, funding may be used to: (1) conduct non time critical removal actions; (2) perform site characterization activities such as preliminary assessments, site inspections, remedial investigations, feasibility studies, and remedial design activities at potential or confirmed hazardous waste sites; (3) conduct remedial actions (i.e., clean up) at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites listed on the National Priorities List (40 CFR 300); (4) support CERCLA implementation activities; (5) identify Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs); (6) conduct settlement negotiations; (7) take enforcement actions against PRPs; and, (8) oversee PRP cleanups. Assistance agreement awards under this program may involve or relate to geospatial information. Further information regarding geospatial information may be obtained by viewing the following website: Geospatial Resources at EPA (https://www.epa.gov/geospatial).Funds may not be used to support Core (non-site specific) activities. Funds may not be used to support Core (non-site specific) activities.;

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. No match (cost share) is required for site assessment or remedial planning at any site if the site was privately owned and operated at the time of disposal of hazardous wastes. For remedial action cooperative agreements: 10 percent state, 90 percent federal if the site was privately owned and operated at the time of disposal of hazardous wastes. Minimum 50 percent state, 50 percent federal, of all response costs if the site was State/locally operated at time of any disposal of hazardous waste (Note: percentage may vary). If IIJA or Special Account funds are used, no cost share is owed for remedial action. See CERCLA section 104(c)(3). Tribal governments are not required to share in the costs of Superfund actions.MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Deadlines

Contact the headquarters or regional location, as appropriate for application deadlines

Award range and average, in the agency's words

Range: $0 to $12,000,000; Approximate Average: $565,000

Examples of funded projects

Fiscal Year2016: Preliminary Assessments/Site Inspections; Remedial Investigation; Feasibility Study; Remedial Design; Remedial Action (i.e., clean up); PRP searches; RI/FS negotiations; RD/RA Negotiations; PRP oversight; Non Time Critical Removal Actions; State participation in federal lead projects, Long Term Remedial action support, Implementation of institutional controls, Technical oversight, Tribal participation, Restoration efforts.Fiscal Year2017: No content availableFiscal Year2018: Non-time critical removal actions, preliminary assessments, site inspections, remedial investigations, feasibility studies, remedial design and remedial actions at sites listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) and five year reviews.Fiscal Year2025: Examples of projects funded under this assistance listing include: Non-time critical removal actions, preliminary assessments, site inspections, remedial investigations, feasibility studies, remedial design and remedial actions at sites listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) and five-year reviews. For additional information on the types of projects funded under this assistance listing, please visit: https://www.epa.gov/superfund.

Quoted from the program's federal Assistance Listing. The notice of funding opportunity is the official source for each competition's rules.

Funding history and past recipients

From fiscal 2021 to 2025, Superfund State, Political Subdivision, and Indian Tribe Site-Specific Cooperative Agreements (66.802) awarded $502 million across 558 grant awards, an average of $899,832 per award.

Top states: Oklahoma ($112 million), New Mexico ($44.6 million), Colorado ($32.1 million), Nebraska ($30.1 million), New Hampshire ($27.9 million), Idaho ($24.8 million), Montana ($22.8 million), South Carolina ($20.9 million), Vermont ($20.8 million), Utah ($19.6 million).

Who usually wins

State and local governments received 87% of the money, tribes 13% and colleges and universities 0.3%.

Recipient typeAwardsAmountShare
State and local governments497$435 million87%
Tribal governments and organizations58$65.0 million13%
Colleges and universities2$1.3 million0.3%
Other1$854,2240.2%

By state

43 states have a page for this program: those that received at least $1 million or 10 awards.

Grants by recipient's state, fiscal 2021 to 2025
StateAwardsAmount
Oklahoma33$112 million
New Mexico31$44.6 million
Colorado22$32.1 million
Nebraska6$30.1 million
New Hampshire21$27.9 million
Idaho12$24.8 million
Montana22$22.8 million
South Carolina20$20.9 million
Vermont6$20.8 million
Utah18$19.6 million
California17$16.2 million
Illinois21$13.9 million
Michigan16$12.7 million
Arizona9$11.0 million
Washington18$10.3 million
Missouri11$7.0 million
New Jersey2$6.3 million
Oregon11$6.1 million
Massachusetts3$5.8 million
Wisconsin22$5.7 million
Ohio16$4.2 million
Minnesota14$4.1 million
New York4$3.3 million
Indiana8$3.3 million
North Carolina12$3.2 million
Tennessee14$2.9 million
Texas3$2.7 million
Kansas3$2.7 million
Nevada7$2.4 million
Maryland20$2.1 million
Virginia22$2.0 million
Delaware28$2.0 million
West Virginia16$2.0 million
Rhode Island3$1.8 million
Kentucky12$1.6 million
Florida4$1.3 million
Connecticut2$1.3 million
Hawaii3$1.3 million
Alaska3$1.2 million
Iowa1$1.1 million
Alabama12$1.1 million
Maine6$1.1 million
Georgia9$1.0 million
Mississippi7$675,566
Arkansas2$461,231
Louisiana1$324,004
South Dakota1$292,511
Puerto Rico4$55,799

Award amounts are federal obligations reported to USAspending.gov for fiscal 2021 to 2025; see how our data works.