Well Told Grants

Federal grant programs / Environmental Protection Agency

Regional Wetland Program Development Grants (66.461)

Also known as Regional/Tribal WPDGs

Regional Wetland Program Development Grants (Assistance Listing 66.461) is run by the Environmental Protection Agency. It awarded $43.3 million in 165 grants from fiscal 2021 to 2025, about $262,530 per award on average. No funding opportunity is open on Grants.gov right now.

The typical award was $250,000. Half of the 165 awards fell between $167,574 and $319,382, and they ranged from $3,528 to $667,621.

Key findings

What the program funds

To assist state, territory, tribal, and/or local government agencies in building programs which protect, manage, and restore wetlands. The primary focus of the grants is to build state, territory, and Tribal wetland programs. A secondary focus is to build local (e.g., county or municipal) programs. Under the Regional Wetland Program Development Grant (WPDG) competition, EPA has identified the following four Core Elements for improving state/Tribe/territory/local governments' ability to protect, manage, and restore their wetlands: (1) Monitoring and Assessment; (2) Voluntary Restoration and Protection; (3) Regulatory Approaches Including CWA 401 Certification; and (4) Wetland-Specific Water Quality Standards. EPA will include a website in each Regional Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) where potential applicants can find a list of actions and activities under each Core Element that will develop or refine a state, Tribal, territory, or local government’s wetlands program. EPA has identified two funding Tracks. Track One is for states, Tribes and territories that propose to develop a Wetlands Program Plan (WPP) as described at https://www.epa.gov/wetlands/developing-state-or-tribal-wetland-program-plan or carrying out projects from an EPA-approved WPP. WPPs can be found on-line at https://www.epa.gov/wetlands/state-and-tribal-wetland-program-plans#r1. Track Two is for states, Tribes, territories, local governments, interstate agencies, intertribal consortia, and universities that are agencies of a state that submit proposals that are consistent with the Four Core Elements as described above. Regions may add additional Region-specific priorities that are compatible and consistent with the core element(s) and action(s) in the Appendix of development and refinement actions found at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-03/documents/wpdg_cef_appendix.pdf. Under the National Tribal competition EPA has identified the following four Core Elements for improving a Tribe's ability to protect and restore their wetlands: (1) Monitoring and Assessment; (2) Voluntary Restoration and Protection; (3) Regulatory Approaches Including CWA 401 Certification; and (4) Wetland-Specific Water Quality Standards. EPA will include a website in the National Tribal NOFO where potential applicants can find a list of actions and activities under each Core Element that will develop or refine a Tribe's wetlands program. EPA has identified two funding Tracks. Track One is for tribes that propose to develop a WPP as described at https://www.epa.gov/wetlands/developing-state-or-tribal-wetland-program-plan or carrying out projects from an EPA-approved WPP. WPPs can be found on-line at https://www.epa.gov/wetlands/state-and-tribal-wetland-program-plans#r1 . Track Two is for Tribes and intertribal consortia that submit proposals that are consistent with the Four Core Elements as described above.

From the federal Assistance Listing. Read the full listing on SAM.gov.

Open opportunities

No opportunity under this program is open or forecast on Grants.gov right now. Programs often post once a year, so the funding history below shows what to expect.

Rules from the program listing

Who can apply

The term "interstate agency" is defined in CWA Section 502 as "an agency of two or more States established by or pursuant to an agreement or compact approved by the Congress, or any other agency of two or more States, having substantial powers or duties pertaining to the control of pollution as determined and approved by the Administrator." Intertribal consortia that meet the requirements of 40 CFR Part 35.504 are eligible for direct funding. Intertribal consortia projects must be broad in scope and encompass more than one state, Tribe, or local government. Universities that are agencies of a state government are eligible to receive funds through these competitions. Universities must include documentation showing that they are chartered as a part of a state government in their proposal. For-profit organizations are not eligible. Non-profit organizations described in Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code that engage in prohibited lobbying activities as defined in Section 3 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 are not eligible to apply. For certain competitive funding opportunities under this assistance listing, the Agency may limit eligibility to compete to a number or subset of eligible applicants consistent with the Agency's Assistance Agreement Competition Policy.

Continue reading on SAM.gov

What the money can and cannot pay for

These grants are intended to encourage comprehensive wetlands program development by promoting the coordination and acceleration of research, investigations, experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies relating to the causes, effects, extent, prevention, reduction, and elimination of water pollution. Projects build the capacity of states, Tribes, territories, and local governments to effectively protect, manage, and restore wetland and riparian resources. Projects funded under this program support the development of a wetland protection, restoration, or management program or support enhancement/refinement of an existing program. Interstate agency and intertribal consortia projects must be broad in scope and encompass more than one state, Tribe, territory or local government. The Regional Office will accept submissions only for projects that affect the states, Tribes, territories and local governments within their Region. Funds cannot be used for day to day running of a state/Tribal/territory/local government wetland program. Funds cannot be used for the purchase of land or conservation easements. Funds cannot be used for implementation of individual CWA 404 permits, mitigation projects, mitigation banks, or in-lieu-fee mitigation programs. Additional uses and restrictions on funds will be described in detail in the competitive announcements.

Continue reading on SAM.gov

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. The applicant must provide a minimum of 25 percent of the total cost of the work plan to the extent allowed by 2 CFR 200 and 1500 as applicable, 40 CFR 35.385, and 35.615. To determine if the minimum match is met, EPA will use the following formula: amount (in dollars) of federal funds requested from EPA divided by 3 = minimum match (in dollars) or Total project costs divided by 4 = minimum match (in dollars). For example, if the applicant requests $75,000 of federal funds or a Total project cost of $100,000 for the three-year project period, it must be able to provide $25,000 in matching funds or services. A reduced match of zero is available for Tribal grantees that place the Wetland Program Development Grant funds in a Performance Partnership Grant. (See regulations at 40 CFR 536(c).) Please contact your EPA Regional contact person listed in Section VII if you have any questions about calculating the match requirement. . Award recipients can meet the match requirement with in-kind or monetary contributions from entities other than themselves. However, other Federal money cannot be used as the match for this grant program unless authorized by the statute governing the award of the other Federal funds. Matching funds are considered grant funds. They must be used for the reasonable and necessary expenses of carrying out the assistance agreement work plan.

Continue reading on SAM.gov

Deadlines

For competitive awards, deadlines will be specified in the NOFO.

Award range and average, in the agency's words

Range: $80,000 to $600,000/fiscal year; Average: $250,000/fiscal year.

Examples of funded projects

Fiscal Year2025: The WPDG database provides project information for grants funded through this program since 2005 (http://iaspub.epa.gov/apex/wdg/f?p=101). Examples of funded projects include: enhancing a Salt Marsh Restoration Assessment Monitoring Program by addressing key scientific information needs identified by resource managers including information on marsh migration mapping and other data needs; complete the first stage of a state’s probabilistic monitoring program (baseline condition) and launch the second stage (change detection); collect statewide field data for several stream metrics and develop regional curves with the collected data for use in determining stream impacts and mitigation under CWA Section 404; update remaining USGS quad maps using the latest available GIS technology; and developing an updated wetlands quality assurance project plan (QAPP) that includes QA/QC procedures for data entry and management. Eight projects were selected for funding under the Tribal FY2024-2025 competition.

Continue reading on SAM.gov

Quoted from the program's federal Assistance Listing. The notice of funding opportunity is the official source for each competition's rules.

Funding history and past recipients

From fiscal 2021 to 2025, Regional Wetland Program Development Grants (66.461) awarded $43.3 million across 165 grant awards, an average of $262,530 per award.

Top states: California ($4.2 million), New Mexico ($2.9 million), Utah ($2.4 million), Colorado ($1.9 million), Virginia ($1.7 million), Washington ($1.7 million), Wisconsin ($1.6 million), Missouri ($1.5 million), New Jersey ($1.4 million), North Carolina ($1.4 million).

Who usually wins

State and local governments received 68% of the money, colleges and universities 19% and tribes 12%.

Recipient typeAwardsAmountShare
State and local governments110$29.6 million68%
Colleges and universities30$8.3 million19%
Tribal governments and organizations23$5.3 million12%
Other2$147,5550.3%

By state

17 states have a page for this program: those that received at least $1 million or 10 awards.

Grants by recipient's state, fiscal 2021 to 2025
StateAwardsAmount
California10$4.2 million
New Mexico7$2.9 million
Utah9$2.4 million
Colorado7$1.9 million
Virginia4$1.7 million
Washington7$1.7 million
Wisconsin8$1.6 million
Missouri5$1.5 million
New Jersey8$1.4 million
North Carolina5$1.4 million
Oregon6$1.3 million
Oklahoma6$1.3 million
Maryland4$1.2 million
Delaware4$1.2 million
Montana4$1.2 million
Nevada3$1.1 million
Vermont6$1.0 million
Michigan3$966,000
North Dakota3$845,916
Minnesota3$826,458
Illinois3$794,461
West Virginia3$786,481
Florida3$719,984
Nebraska4$713,044
Massachusetts4$647,204
Puerto Rico2$606,841
Ohio2$600,000
Hawaii2$590,971
Idaho2$587,049
Kansas3$586,161
New Hampshire4$550,309
South Carolina2$526,179
Rhode Island2$512,440
New York2$498,822
Pennsylvania1$498,673
Alabama1$469,379
Maine2$432,583
Arkansas2$421,950
Mississippi2$372,595
Alaska3$319,325
Indiana1$300,000
District of Columbia1$167,574
Connecticut1$151,552
U.S. Virgin Islands1$65,628

Award amounts are federal obligations reported to USAspending.gov for fiscal 2021 to 2025; see how our data works.