Well Told Grants

Federal grant programs / Department of the Treasury

Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States (21.015)

Also known as Gulf RESTORE - Direct Component and Centers of Excellence Research Grants Programs

Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States (Assistance Listing 21.015) is run by the Departmental Offices, part of the Department of the Treasury. It awarded $520 million in 129 grants from fiscal 2021 to 2025, about $4.0 million per award on average. 5 funding opportunities are open or forecast now.

The typical award was $1.5 million. Half of the 129 awards fell between $500,000 and $4.1 million, and they ranged from $28,224 to $122 million.

Key findings

What the program funds

Treasury administers the Direct Component program and Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program. The primary objective of the Direct Component program is to provide funds to eligible entities for the ecological and economic restoration of the Gulf Coast Region. For the Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program, the primary objective is for the establishment of Centers of Excellence that focus on science, technology, and monitoring in one or more of the five eligible disciplines in the Gulf Coast States.

From the federal Assistance Listing. Read the full listing on SAM.gov.

Open opportunities

Rules from the program listing

Who can apply

The RESTORE Act identifies the entities that are eligible to apply for grants under the Direct Component program. Treasury's implementing regulations at 31 CFR 34.302 list the eligible states, counties, and parishes under the Direct Component as follows: in Alabama, the Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council or such administrative agent as it may designate; in Florida, the Florida counties of Bay, Charlotte, Citrus, Collier, Dixie, Escambia, Franklin, Gulf, Hernando, Hillsborough, Jefferson, Lee, Levy, Manatee, Monroe, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, Taylor, Wakulla, and Walton; in Louisiana, the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board of Louisiana through the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana; in Louisiana, the Louisiana parishes of Ascension, Assumption, Calcasieu, Cameron, Iberia, Jefferson, Lafourche, Livingston, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. James, St. John the Baptist, St. Martin, St. Mary, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa, Terrebonne, and Vermilion; in Mississippi, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality; and in Texas, the Office of the Governor or an appointee of the Office of the Governor. The RESTORE Act and Treasury's implementing regulations at 31 CFR 34.702 also identifies the entities that are eligible to apply for grants under the Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program.

Continue reading on SAM.gov

What the money can and cannot pay for

For the Direct Component, the RESTORE Act specifies the types of eligible programs, projects, and activities which includes the following: (1) Restoration and protection of the natural resources, ecosystems, fisheries, marine and wildlife habitats, beaches and coastal wetlands of the Gulf Coast Region; (2) Mitigation of damage to fish, wildlife and natural resources; (3) Implementation of a Federally approved marine, coastal, or comprehensive conservation management plan, including fisheries monitoring; (4) Workforce development and job creation; (5) Improvements to or on state parks located in coastal areas affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill; (6) Infrastructure projects benefitting the economy or ecological resources, including port infrastructure; (7) Coastal flood protection and related infrastructure; (8) Planning assistance; (9) Promotion of tourism in the Gulf Coast Region, including promotion of recreational fishing; (10) Promotion of the consumption of seafood harvested from the Gulf Coast Region; and (11) Administrative costs. Not more than 3 percent of the amounts received by the eligible entity may be used for administrative costs, as defined in Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 CFR 34.204(a)(1).

Continue reading on SAM.gov

Matching requirements

Statutory Formula: Title 31, Part 34, Subpart B,Public Law Public Law.Statutory Formula: Title 31 Chapter Department of the Treasury Part 34 Subpart B Public LawMatching requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing. MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Award range and average, in the agency's words

Treasury is only able to provide information on obligations for past fiscal years. The amount of funding available in FY 2025 will depend on the trust fund allocated to each eligible entity and the amount of funding obligated in FY 2025 will depend on the amount requested by each eligible entity for their respective projects. This program does not have pre-established award amounts or total obligation amounts. Instead, Treasury obligates funding based on the requests received from eligible entities, as long as that amount does not exceed the net allocation amount available in the Trust Fund to the respective entity. Past projects have ranged from $40,000 to over $20,000,000. Under no circumstances will award amounts exceed the amount available in the entity’s Trust Fund account.

Examples of funded projects

Fiscal Year2025: An example of a Direct Component-funded project is a multi-phase, multi-year interdisciplinary construction and restoration effort along the southeastern edge of Calcasieu Lake. This initiative entails building seven lake-rim gravity drainage structures with backflow prevention systems designed to enhance hydrologic connectivity and reduce flooding in surrounding wetlands. By creating up to 2,000 acres of new marsh, the project supports long-term coastal resilience and infrastructure strength, helping to protect critical habitat and nearby communities, reduce land-loss, and maintain the region’s economic vitality. An example of a Centers of Excellence Research Grants project is repurposing offshore oil and gas infrastructure (such as, platforms, wells, pipelines, and power transmission) for energy transition uses (such as, power from wind, solar and wave energy sources, green hydrogen generation, and storage). The project goal is to extend the life of offshore infrastructure for two decades or more in order to influence the preparation and planning for future marine energy and effluent storage in the Gulf.

Quoted from the program's federal Assistance Listing. The notice of funding opportunity is the official source for each competition's rules.

Funding history and past recipients

From fiscal 2021 to 2025, Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States (21.015) awarded$520 million across 129 grant awards, an average of $4.0 million per award.

Largest recipients, fiscal 2021 to 2025
RecipientStateAwardsAmount
Coastal Protection & Restoration Authority of LouisianaLouisiana3$131 million
Department of Environmental Quality MississippiMississippi33$122 million
Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural ResourcesAlabama16$119 million
Texas Commission on Environmental QualityTexas8$36.4 million
County of EscambiaFlorida15$21.7 million
County of OkaloosaFlorida5$17.1 million
Florida Institute of OceanographyFlorida2$16.7 million
County of Santa RosaFlorida2$12.3 million
Walton County Board of CommissionersFlorida6$6.5 million
Franklin County Board of County CommissionersFlorida4$6.0 million
City of New Orleans Mayoral OfficeLouisiana1$4.2 million
Jefferson Parish GovernmentLouisiana1$3.6 million
County of Wakulla Board of County CommissionersFlorida2$3.1 million
Bay County Board of County CommisionersFlorida5$3.1 million
Terrebonne Parish Consolidated GovernmentLouisiana1$2.9 million
Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana4$2.4 million
Calcasieu Parish ofLouisiana1$2.1 million
St Bernard Parish GovermentLouisiana4$2.0 million
Sarasota, County ofFlorida1$1.9 million
Cameron Parish Police JuryLouisiana1$1.4 million

Top states: Louisiana ($153 million), Mississippi ($122 million), Alabama ($119 million), Florida ($89.7 million), Texas ($36.4 million).

Who usually wins

State and local governments received 97% of the money, colleges and universities 3.3%.

Recipient typeAwardsAmountShare
State and local governments127$504 million97%
Colleges and universities2$17.0 million3.3%

By state

Each state below has its own page for this program, with its recipients and yearly totals.

Grants by recipient's state, fiscal 2021 to 2025
StateAwardsAmount
Louisiana23$153 million
Mississippi33$122 million
Alabama16$119 million
Florida49$89.7 million
Texas8$36.4 million

Award amounts are federal obligations reported to USAspending.gov for fiscal 2021 to 2025; see how our data works.