Well Told Grants

Federal grant programs / Department of Agriculture

Smith-Lever Extension Funding (10.511)

Also known as 1862 LGI’s: 1862 CES (Smith-Lever) and DCPPERA, 1862 Smith-Lever Special Needs, and Smith-Lever Special Needs-Competitive

Smith-Lever Extension Funding (Assistance Listing 10.511) is run by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, part of the Department of Agriculture. It awarded $1.6 billion in 365 grants from fiscal 2021 to 2025, about $4.3 million per award on average. No funding opportunity is open on Grants.gov right now.

The typical award was $2.9 million. Half of the 365 awards fell between $1.3 million and $7.5 million, and they ranged from $11,347 to $14.5 million.

Key findings

What the program funds

Joint Cooperative Extension Programs at 1862 Land-grant Institutions and University of the District of Columbia Public Postsecondary Education Reorganization Act Program: To develop practical applications of research knowledge; instructions and practical demonstrations of existing or improved practices or technologies in agriculture; uses of energy with respect to agriculture and home economics; subjects relating to persons not attending or resident in 1862 Land-grant Institutions; imparting information on those subjects through demonstrations, publications, and otherwise; and for the necessary printing and distribution of information in connection with the subjects. Cooperative Extension Programs at 1862 Land-grant Institutions (Smith-Lever Special Needs): To support Extension activities identified in the eligible institution’s approved pre-existing 5-year plan of work (POW). SLSN funds are allocated to a State Cooperative Extension Service to fulfill a purpose not normally a part of the continuing Extension program. Smith-lever Special Needs Competitive Grants Program (SLSNCGP): To support innovative, education-based approaches to address disaster preparedness and specific responses related to disasters or disaster threats caused by natural, human-made, or technological hazards, or by other factors that contribute to the exposure or vulnerability of a community.

From the federal Assistance Listing. Read the full listing on SAM.gov.

Open opportunities

No opportunity under this program is open or forecast on Grants.gov right now. Programs often post once a year, so the funding history below shows what to expect.

Rules from the program listing

Who can apply

1862 CES Capacity & DCPPERA: Joint Cooperative Extension Programs at 1862 Land-Grant Institutions applications may only be submitted by the following 1862 Land-grant Institutions: Auburn University, University of Alaska-Fairbanks, American Samoa Community College, University of Arizona, University of Arkansas, University of California, Colorado State University, University of Connecticut, University of Delaware, University of Florida, University of Georgia, University of Guam, University of Hawaii, University of Idaho, University of Illinois, Purdue University, Iowa State University, Kansas State University, University of Kentucky, Louisiana State University, University of Maine, University of Maryland-College Park, University of Massachusetts, Michigan State University, College of Micronesia, University of Minnesota, Mississippi State University, University of Missouri, Montana State University, University of Nebraska, University of Nevada-Reno, University of New Hampshire, Rutgers University, New Mexico State University, Cornell University, North Carolina State University, North Dakota State University, Northern Marianas College, Ohio State University, Oklahoma State University, Oregon State University, Pennsylvania State University, University of Puerto Rico, University of Rhode Island, Clemson University, South Dakota State University, University of Tennessee, Texas A & M University, Utah State University, University of Vermont, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State...

Continue reading on SAM.gov

What the money can and cannot pay for

USES: 1862 CES Capacity (Smith-Lever) and DCPPERA: Funding for the Cooperative Extension Programs at 1862 Land-Grant Institutions authorized under the Smith-Lever Act section 3(b) and (c) (SLBC) and the University of the District of Columbia Public Postsecondary Education Reorganization Act Program (DCPPERA) under Section 208 of the District of Columbia Public Postsecondary Education Reorganization Act is to be used for the development of practical applications of research knowledge and giving of instruction and practical demonstrations of existing or improved practices or technologies in agriculture, uses of solar energy with respect to agriculture, home economics, and rural energy, and subjects relating thereto to persons not attending or resident in 1862 Land-Grant Institutions, and imparting information on those subjects through demonstrations, publications, and otherwise and for the necessary printing and distribution of information in connection with the subjects. Program and Extension Activities - Smith-Lever Act sections 3(b) and 3(c) Federal funding may only be used for extension programs and an activity identified in the institution’s approved 5-Year Plan of Work. 1862 Special Needs Capacity Grants Program (SLSN): 1862 Smith Lever Special Needs Capacity funds support extension education initiatives that address risks, hazards and disasters.

Continue reading on SAM.gov

Matching requirements

This program has no statutory formula. 100 percent match from non-Federal sources is required. See the program NOFO for specific details.MOE requirements are not applicable to this assistance listing.

Deadlines

Contact the headquarters or regional location, as appropriate for application deadlines

Award range and average, in the agency's words

If minimum or maximum amounts of funding per capacity project grant, or cooperative agreement are established, these amounts will be announced in the annual Request for Application (RFA).

Quoted from the program's federal Assistance Listing. The notice of funding opportunity is the official source for each competition's rules.

Funding history and past recipients

From fiscal 2021 to 2025, Smith-Lever Extension Funding (10.511) awarded $1.6 billion across 365 grant awards, an average of $4.3 million per award.

Largest recipients, fiscal 2021 to 2025
RecipientStateAwardsAmount
Texas A&m Agrilife Extension ServiceTexas10$72.1 million
North Carolina State UniversityNorth Carolina5$62.5 million
The Ohio State UniversityOhio5$60.3 million
The Pennsylvania State UniversityPennsylvania5$56.5 million
University of IllinoisIllinois5$51.5 million
Iowa State University of Science and TechnologyIowa5$50.9 million
The University of Kentucky Research FoundationKentucky5$49.6 million
Michigan State University FoundationMichigan5$49.3 million
Purdue UniversityIndiana5$49.0 million
University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin5$48.8 million
University of Missouri SystemMissouri5$48.8 million
Regents of the University of MinnesotaMinnesota5$48.1 million
University of TennesseeTennessee5$46.7 million
Cornell UniversityNew York5$45.2 million
The Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia5$42.9 million
University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc.Georgia5$42.8 million
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State UniversityVirginia5$39.3 million
Auburn UniversityAlabama5$37.6 million
Agricultural Extension ServicePuerto Rico5$37.1 million
Mississippi State UniversityMississippi5$36.8 million

Top states: Texas ($72.1 million), North Carolina ($62.5 million), Ohio ($60.3 million), Pennsylvania ($56.5 million), Illinois ($51.5 million), Iowa ($50.9 million), Kentucky ($49.6 million), Michigan ($49.3 million), Indiana ($49.0 million), Wisconsin ($48.8 million).

Who usually wins

Colleges and universities received 99% of the money, state and local governments 0.1%.

Recipient typeAwardsAmountShare
Colleges and universities363$1.5 billion99%
Other1$11.4 million0.7%
State and local governments1$2.2 million0.1%

By state

Each state below has its own page for this program, with its recipients and yearly totals.

Grants by recipient's state, fiscal 2021 to 2025
StateAwardsAmount
Texas10$72.1 million
North Carolina5$62.5 million
Ohio5$60.3 million
Pennsylvania5$56.5 million
Illinois5$51.5 million
Iowa5$50.9 million
Kentucky5$49.6 million
Michigan5$49.3 million
Indiana5$49.0 million
Wisconsin5$48.8 million
Missouri5$48.8 million
Minnesota5$48.1 million
Tennessee5$46.7 million
New York5$45.2 million
California5$42.9 million
Georgia5$42.8 million
Virginia5$39.3 million
Alabama5$37.6 million
Puerto Rico5$37.1 million
Mississippi5$36.8 million
Arkansas5$31.6 million
Oklahoma5$30.9 million
South Carolina5$30.8 million
Kansas10$30.1 million
Louisiana5$27.6 million
Nebraska10$27.3 million
Washington6$25.9 million
Florida5$25.8 million
West Virginia5$22.4 million
Oregon10$21.2 million
South Dakota10$19.3 million
North Dakota10$18.5 million
Maryland5$18.3 million
Colorado10$17.8 million
Idaho10$15.6 million
Montana10$14.9 million
New Jersey5$14.5 million
Massachusetts5$14.5 million
Maine5$12.9 million
New Mexico10$11.9 million
Connecticut5$11.8 million
Arizona10$11.5 million
Guam5$10.5 million
U.S. Virgin Islands5$10.3 million
Vermont10$10.2 million
American Samoa5$10.2 million
Northern Mariana Islands5$10.1 million
Utah10$9.9 million
New Hampshire5$9.6 million
Wyoming10$9.1 million
Federated States of Micronesia4$8.6 million
Hawaii5$7.4 million
Delaware5$7.2 million
Nevada10$6.9 million
Alaska10$6.6 million
District of Columbia5$6.3 million
Rhode Island5$6.0 million

Award amounts are federal obligations reported to USAspending.gov for fiscal 2021 to 2025; see how our data works.