G24AS00358: Cooperative Agreement for CESU-affiliated Partner with the Gulf Coast Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit
Closed
This grant is closed. A newer notice from the same program is open now: Cooperative Agreement for affiliated Partner with Alaska Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (G27AS00066). Status: Closes December 7, 2026 (30 days left). It is in our archive of Geological Survey notices from 2024.
Geological Survey offered grants of up to $150,000 to the applicants described in the notice. Applications closed on June 3, 2024.
From the official notice on Grants.gov, last changed May 2, 2024. Checked November 7, 2026.
- Award ceiling$150,000
- Cost sharingNot required
- Funding typeCooperative Agreement
Other notices with this title
| Notice | Posted | Deadline | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| G24AS00357 | May 7, 2024 | Closed June 7, 2024 | Closed |
| G21AS00559 | June 9, 2021 | Closed July 9, 2021 | Closed |
Key dates
| Posted | May 2, 2024 |
|---|---|
| Deadline | June 3, 2024 |
Who can apply
This opportunity was open to the applicants described in the notice.
- Others (see text field entitled "Additional Information on Eligibility" for clarification)
This financial assistance opportunity is being issued under a Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) Program. CESU’s are partnerships that provide research, technical assistance, and education. Eligible recipients must be a participating partner of the Gulf Coast Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) Program.
Is this a realistic fit?
- Past U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection awards averaged $557,251; this notice allows up to $150,000 per award.
- Most of the program's money (84% over five years) went to colleges and universities.
- No cost sharing or match is required.
What the grant funds
The US Geological Survey is offering a funding opportunity to a CESU partner for research in assessing invasive hitchhikers on imported aquatic plants: exploring the role of plant structural complexity in facilitating introductions. Once an aquatic invasive species (AIS) becomes established, it is rarely possible to eradicate. The best way to avoid the negative impacts that invasive species can cause to a watershed's ecological function, economic value, or citizens' health is to prevent their initial entry. To date, the unintended transport of exotic species alongside imported aquatic plants, algae, and their packaging represents an underappreciated invasion pathway. The high structural complexity of many common aquarium and ornamental aquatic macrophytes reduces encounter rates with fauna which may reside within interstitial spaces and thus go undetected. This potentially problematic pathway was highlighted in the recent Marimo moss ball (Aegagropila linnaei) contamination incident carrying live hitchhiker zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and a multitude of other exotic taxa in the spring of 2021. Given that introductions of exotic aquatic species contribute to millions of dollars of damage and management costs for the U.S., the identification of potential aquatic plants, algae, and packaging with a high potential of serving as a vector for unintended hitchhikers will aid in managing this group of organisms in trade. Evaluate currently imported aquatic plants and algae for hitchhiking taxa and determine factors (e.g., plant/algae species and their structural complexity, packaging, country of origin, vendor, etc.) influencing the unintended importation of non-native species. Because the live aquarium/ornamental trade is a significant global market, this work will be landscape in nature and not specific to a geographic region and, as such, will serve to provide information that is useful on a nation-wide scale. To accomplish this by conducting a lab-based, empirical investigation of plants, algae, and their packaging for hitchhiking organisms. The products of this effort include a list of hitchhikers on the common aquatic plants and algae, along with an assessment of plants, regions, packaging materials, shipping, handling, and other factors that will most likely serve as a source of hitchhikers. This project will provide vital information that will assist in the prevention of invasive species introduction on a nation-wide, landscape scale.
Who has won U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection grants before
From fiscal 2021 to 2025, U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection (15.808) awarded $629 million across 1,128 grant awards, an average of $557,251 per award.
| Recipient | State | Awards | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines | Colorado | 12 | $242 million |
| University of Alaska Fairbanks | Alaska | 18 | $28.7 million |
| California Institute of Technology | California | 5 | $19.0 million |
| University of Washington | Washington | 17 | $17.6 million |
| University Enterprises, Inc. | California | 4 | $15.4 million |
Applying now
This notice no longer takes applications. Apply under the newer notice, G27AS00066, which is open now.
The notice on Grants.gov keeps its full text and attachments, which is useful for planning a resubmission.
Questions people ask
Is G24AS00358 still open?
No. It closed on June 3, 2024. A newer notice is open: G27AS00066, closes December 7, 2026 (30 days left).
Who can apply for Cooperative Agreement for CESU-affiliated Partner with the Gulf Coast Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit?
Geological Survey accepted applications from the applicants described in the notice. The notice adds further conditions, so read its eligibility section.
What is the deadline for Cooperative Agreement for CESU-affiliated Partner with the Gulf Coast Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit?
Closed June 3, 2024. Applications are no longer accepted; the program's newer notices are on this page when there are any.
How much funding is available?
Awards of up to $150,000 each.
Who has won U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection grants before?
The largest recipients over five fiscal years were Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines, University of Alaska Fairbanks, California Institute of Technology. The program made 1,128 awards worth $629 million in that time.